From the LVRJ: After a customer placed a $47,000 wager in a Manchester, England,
sports book on President Barack Obama to win re-election Tuesday,
William Hill was forced to update its odds overseas on the U.S.
presidential election.
The updated odds were released Monday as
both President Obama and his Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, spent
their final day on the campaign trail before Election Day. William Hill
has shorted Obama's odds to 2-9, with Romney now at 10-3.
Following
their final debate in October, the bookmaker trimmed Obama's odds from
4-9 to 2-5, while Romney was shifted from 7-2 to 15-8.
"With the
race to the White House entering the final furlong, political punters
appear to believe Obama is beginning to pull clear," said William Hill
spokesman Graham Sharpe.
Sharpe said there are still some gamblers
who think Romney could "snatch victory on the line," with one of the
British bookmaker's London-based clients putting $39,000 on the
Republican challenger.
"Our turnover on the election is into seven
figures for the first time, and up to ($15.97 million) will be riding
on the outcome industrywide," Sharpe said. http://www.lvrj.com/business/william-hill-makes-obama-a-2-9-favorite-to-win-election-177322641.html
All this means is that the bettors in jolly old England are putting more money on Obama than Romney. That's all this means. If more money was being put on Romney, then Romney would be the favorite in England.
And just remember, England still has a queen and monarchy system, so it's not like they are used to voting for a president or anything like that.
FAFO for UW System's Rothman
7 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment