From Fox News: "The Obama administration told Scottish officials last August that, although it opposed any release of the Lockerbie bomber, it would rather see him released in Scotland than transferred to a Libyan prison, according to a secret memo obtained by The Sunday Times in London. The publication of the memo's contents comes just days after President Obama, at a press conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron, said "all of us ... were surprised, disappointed and angry" by the Scottish government's decision to free Abdel Baset al-Megrahi last year. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/25/obama-administration-reportedly-backed-lockerbie-release-transfer-libyan-prison/
First, how can you say you oppose the thug's release but then you wink and say if you release him, release him in Scotland? No, you just you oppose the release, plain and simple with no qualifiers. No release, period.
And then you say you want him released into the general population in Scotland as opposed to prison. Why?
Makes no sense whatsoever.
More from Fox: According to The Sunday Times, Scottish officials viewed U.S. resistance to the release as "half-hearted." The Guardian reported on the existence of the memo last year, but the U.S. government reportedly has tried to keep its contents secret. The Sunday Times was the first to publish the memo's text. Even Scotland doesn't take the Obama administration seriously and I wonder why the Obama administration wanted this secret? Maybe hide from the public, the buffoonery of the Obama administration?
Finally, there were news reports tis past week or so, and also reported by Jerry Doyle that maybe the release of the thug terrorist was related to BP and opening up oil fields to BP. Gee, I wonder if the Obama administration had something to do with that trial balloon?
Worst president ever.
At the Prairie Café...
6 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment