Umm, Harry, obama Said Pass The Jobs Bill Now

Apparently, Crybaby Harry Reid didn't hear President Obama when he said to pass the newest jobs immediately.
From The Charlotte Observer: Does anyone still doubt that this bill is nothing but politics and has a snowball's chance in hell of getting passed? The bill is not even written yet for crying out loud! What is it with these people?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/09/obama-jobs-speech-rig...
Obama's urgent jobs plan: Right now, 'right now' means sometime next month maybe
September 19, 2011 5:18 am 86419
Everybody remembers the urgency of President Obama's attitude toward the awful jobs situation.
Back in early August, Obama said the jobs situation was so urgent that he was going to give another speech about it -- in a month or so, in September after his vacation on Martha's Vineyard.
And then in September the president announced he would give his major jobs speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 7. But he neglected to check with congressional leaders first. And they suggested the 8th. So, since it was their House, the 8th it was.
"Tonight," the president said in the first 34 of his 4,021 words to a national television audience that night, "we meet at an urgent time for our country. We continue to face an economic crisis that has left millions of our neighbors jobless, and a political crisis that has made things worse."
The speech got panned as another political campaign one with Obama announcing, in effect, that....
...since the first stimulus spending plan of $787 billion hadn't really worked, maybe another $447 billion stimulus spending plan would.
This is the kind of thinking that can make sense within Washington. But since "stimulus" has become a laugh line, he didn't use that word anymore....
Well, here we are on the next Monday after that next Monday and we've just learned from the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, Dick Durbin, that actually it seems that body won't really be seriously getting into the legislation for a while yet. The Senate has some other more important business to handle. And then there's this month's congressional vacation, which in Washington is called "a recess," like elementary school.
Here's the revealing exchange with a persistent host Candy Crowley on CNN's "State of the Union:"
CROWLEY: When is the bill going to get on the floor?
DURBIN: The bill is on the calendar. Majority leader Reid moved it to the calendar. It is ready and poised. There are a couple other items we may get into this week not on the bill and some related issues that may create jobs. But we're going to move forward on the president's bill. There will be a healthy debate. I hope the Republicans will come to...
CROWLEY: After the recess, so next month? Or when will it actually begin to act on?
DURBIN: I think that's more realistic it would be next month.
So, as of right now, "right now" uttered on Sept. 8 really means sometime at least one month later.
Good thing the president's own Democratic party controls the Senate. Because, otherwise, there might be some kind of silly, unnecessary delays in deliberating Obama's urgent jobs bill that he says will surely help the nation's unemployed millions if only those Republicans don't connive to slow things down.
http://forums.charlotteobserver.com/?q=node/13146
The liberals claim they that are all about jobs is just a flat out lie. Instead of getting this supposedly great bill to the floor of the senate, Obama is spouting off about raising taxes on the rich, military retirees and probably everyone who breathes.
So, when you hear a democrat talk about jobs, just look at them and call them liars. They are not interested in jobs, they are just using jobs for political purposes only.