Monday, March 4, 2013

Matt Ward Shows His Incompetence, Hatred, Slander

Matt "Jerry Sandusky" Ward replied to one of my posts and said this:
This is Matt Ward.
Dan, you are pathetic. If you are going to post such garbage to the three Wisconsin family members of yours who actually read this crap, please at least give me the courtesy of explaining the newspaper's decision. Of course, that might run counter to your right wing nutcase agenda, which is to paint me as some evil bully liberal newspaper guy...did we put your DUI in the paper? Is that why your so upset? Was it child porn that you got in trouble for? Is that it? Special education is right, huh? Dan...at Findlay?
Actually, I don't care who you are or what your agenda is...but for your information our photographer was given explicit permission by Judge Robert Lane to take this photo. He even asked twice to make sure he heard correctly. And we did not include any identifying information beyond the jurors' images...can you tell who these people are? Were there any repercussions? No. It was meant to illustrate a story...the jurors went to the crime scene...how often does that happen in Pahrump?
You, sir, are a turd. Feel free to come up to the PVT anytime you like and we can discuss my methods and decisions all you want...maybe I'll even come to your workplace and critique your teaching skills.
Love, your favorite bully, Mr. Ward (to you)
  http://lasvegasbadger.blogspot.com/2012/11/pahrump-valley-times-major-incompetence.html
Apparently, Ward doesn't understand the term "slander" and "libel".  I'm sure a lawyer would be interested in taking some of Ward's money.
But I am a big boy, unlike Ward.  Of course, I cannot comment on his newspaper because the little chickenshit banned me.  But of course, I am the bigger boy and not going to ban Ward, but I think his bosses at Stephens Media might be interested in his posts.
And Mr. Ward, I would love to have you come and observe me teach and I might actually teach you some writing skills, along with some interpersonal skills. 
 

3 comments:

  1. Dan, listen to this internet radio show.....This is BS!!

    http://www.ustream.tv/channel/kptu#/recorded/29735648

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes Mr Moron Ward, yes it did affect the jury and yes you can see the people and know who they are. One was Brenda Ermi off the top of my head. Thank you for the ammo for the mistrial. Hopefully Mr Robbins attorneys can now use this!!! Please Mr. Winder and Mr. Winstock, please use this to get Mr Robbins free.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No pictures of the jury are allowed until after the verdict has been read--and even then only with explicit permission of any jury member who wants to talk or have their picture published. This is why during TV coverage of trials the camera never focuses on the jury at any time.

    As I see it, for the judge to allow a picture of the jury to be taken by a newspaper during a trial is grounds for mistrial, and I hope one is granted here.

    ReplyDelete