Sports leagues and their
insurers are working to stop the practice, which has paid an estimated $747
million to about 4,500 players since the early 1980s, according to the Los
Angeles Times (http://lat.ms/XLiSkD
).
Some of the athletes played as
little as one game in California.
Denver
Broncos running back Terrell
Davis, a former Super Bowl Most Valuable Player, got a $199,000 settlement
for injuries related to football. This came despite the fact Davis was on the
roster of a Colorado team and played just nine times in the Golden State during
an 88-game career, the newspaper said.
Among other sports stars
receiving settlements were NBA
star Moses
Malone, who was awarded $155,000, and Dallas
Cowboys great Michael
Irvin, who received $249,000.The athletes are taking advantage of a provision in state law that provides payments for the cumulative effect of injuries over years of playing.
The benefits usually come as lump-sum settlements but sometimes provide lifetime medical services.
California taxpayers are not responsible for these payments; workers' compensation is an employer-funded program. Anyone who is employed in the state for any period of time can be eligible for benefits to pay for medical expenses and compensate for work-related disabilities.
"The system is completely out of whack right now," said Jeff Gewirtz, vice president of the NBA's Brooklyn Nets, told the Times....
"California is a last resort for
a lot of these guys because they've already been cut off in the other states,"
said Mel
Owens, a former Los
Angeles Rams linebacker who is now a compensation lawyer.
Legislation in Sacramento being
drafted by team owners would not limit the ability of athletes for the Los
Angeles Lakers, San Francisco 49ers, Oakland
Raiders and other in-state teams to seek cumulative trauma benefits under
California law, the Times said. However, it would protect those teams from being
hit by big claims from out-of-state players, who might have spent just a few
weeks at a training camp with a California team at some point in
their careers.Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Report-Athletes-cash-in-on-Calif-workers-comp-4302828.php#ixzz2LqgoRTXa
They say that taxpayers are not affected, but who pays for the workman's compensation? Employers do and in turn, consumers.
I think I should work in California for a few weeks and then claim workman's comp when I retire and get nice pay out.
No comments:
Post a Comment