From the Best of the Web:
"First of all, I didn't set a red line," Barack Obama
said today at a press conference in Stockholm. "The world set a red line. The
world set a red line when governments representing 98% of the world's population
said the use of chemical weapons are [sic] abhorrent and passed a treaty
forbidding their use, even when countries are engaged in war."
Well, here's what Obama said at an Aug. 20, 2012, White House press
conference in response to a reporter's question about Syria:I have, at this point, not ordered military engagement in the situation. But the point that you made about chemical and biological weapons is critical. That's an issue that doesn't just concern Syria; it concerns our close allies in the region, including Israel. It concerns us. We cannot have a situation where chemical or biological weapons are falling into the hands of the wrong people. We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.The context makes clear that when Obama refers to "a red line for us," the antecedent is not the world but the U.S. or the administration (which are interchangeable for the purpose of a discussion of executive action). He said the use of chemical weapons would change "my calculus" and "my equation," not the world's.
As The Weekly Standard's Daniel Halper notes, the
president's denial that he set a red line contradicts previous statements from
his own subordinates. "We go on to reaffirm that the President has set a clear
red line as it relates to the United States that the use of chemical weapons
. . . is a red line that is not acceptable to us, nor should it be to the
international community," an unnamed "White House official" said during
introductory remarks in an April 25, 2013 conference
call with reporters.
Lest there be any question, the official went on to say
in response to a question: "The people in Syria and the Assad regime should know
that the President means what he says when he set that red line. And keep in
mind, he is the one who laid down that marker." http://online.wsj.com/public/search?article-doc-type=%7BBest%20of%20the%20web%20today%7D
You get curiously literal when it applies to Obama, Dan! Yes, he made the "red line" statement (he had to answer the question somehow). But he didn't invent international law. He's not the first world leader to consider the use of chemical weapons to be an intolerable violation of international law.
ReplyDeleteAnd, at least, we KNOW that chemical weapons were at least used, even if we're not certain it was by the Syrian government. So, we don't have to worry about being lied into war, like last time. . .