From the LVRJ: Over the protests of Republicans, the Senate Education Committee approved a bill Friday to allow high school seniors to secure full-fledged diplomas even if they fall a couple of points short of the standards on one section of the proficiency exam.
Under Assembly Bill 456, students who earn at least a 2.75 GPA and have had no discipline or attendance problems could receive standard diplomas if their overall score on the four-part proficiency exam was above the passing score, even though their scores fall short in one part of the test.
Students still would be required to try at least six times to earn passing scores on all sections of the test.
About 60 percent of students fail the math test the first time they take it. Joyce Haldeman, associate superintendent of the Clark County School District, said the bill would help about 100 students a year who invariably fail the math portion of the test, even though they pass other sections and do well in the classroom.
The bill, which would go into effect July 1, passed 5-2.
http://www.lvrj.com/news/committee-approves-plan-to-reform-diploma-requirements-121818399.html
This is a good start, but they need to get rid of the proficiency exams for good. The people who like the proficiency exams says it will cheapen a diploma. However, that is BS. Nowadays, teachers, schools and school districts are teaching to the test and very little else. Is this good education policy? Doubtful.
Further, the main testing dates in the late Fall shut down education for a week. Some kids don't have to come to school or if their teacher is proctoring an exam, their class turns into fun time in the cafeteria. How is this helping education?
Further, it cost millions and millions of dollars to create, publish, distribute, give, collect, grade and analyze the results of the exams. Don't you think the money good be better spent? All this is giving test makers, bureaucrats and teachers a cushy job and make a good living at it, all at the expense of the children.
Further, I am surprised this has not come up, but a good lawyer could sue the State and school districts and say the tests are discriminatory. In Nevada, we have a very large Hispanic population and many of the high school students of Hispanic heritage can't pass the tests because they write and read poorly in English, even though they might be extremely intelligent. Isn't that discrimination? I've seen much weaker discrimination cases be successful.
Hopefully some people up in Carson City can get the courage and convince other state legislators that the proficiency exams are a waste of time, waste of money and they really don't prove anything other than the teachers taught to the test.
Time to get rid of the exams.
Sunrise — 7:03.
4 hours ago
I am a senior in high school and have yet to pass my math test. I took the test a few weeks ago and it is my deciding factor if I will get my diploma or just a certificate of attendance. I have good grades and passed all other tests. I don't understand how they can let one test basically decide my future for me. I have undergone numerous hours of tutoring and studying and sleepless nights for this stupid math test. They don't even tell you your problem areas in the test, just only if you passed it or not. Nothing to guide you as you study again for the retake. These tests are most certainly a waste of time and money and cripple students when they could have a really good future but won't because they can't get their diploma. These tests need to get thrown out.
ReplyDeleteI finished school early, with extra credits. I was given a certificate of attendance because I failed the math test. Which I missed by two the first two times and four the other three times. Yes, I've taken that test five times. I graduated in 2008. I passed the other two the first try, but math is my weak spot. It doesn't make it any easier knowing that you won't graduate if you fail. The test is unfair and pointless.
ReplyDelete