Thursday, April 4, 2013

Obama's Sequester: Unemployment Checks Cut

From the Burlington Free Press:Vermonters receiving extended unemployment compensation will see a 10.7 percent reduction in the checks that come in the mail next Wednesday.
Fish monitoring and fish stocking will be reduced and vacant Fish and Wildlife positions left unfilled.
Area agencies on aging are planning how to ensure essential congregate meal services continue.
Those are some of the most immediate impacts of the automatic federal budget cuts known as sequestration that began to take effect March 1.
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20130404/NEWS03/304040021/Sequester-cuts-to-shrink-Vermont-unemployment-checks-next-week?nclick_check=1
But Obama can spend hundred's of thousands of dollars of taxpayer money going to Denver to screw his mistress and to California to fundraise.
I'm sure those of who will get cuts in unemployment will be just thrilled to hear this.
And I am sure Nevada and other states are in the same boat.
Thank you Obama.
You worthless piece of crap.

2 comments:

  1. I'm losing the plot, Dan. You've got conservatives trying to claim Obama is secretly gay. Now they're saying he has a mistress. You've got a sequester that was invented to be so distasteful that no WAY would it be let to happen, and then Congress lets it happen, and it's Obama's fault? Even though Boehner said he got 98% of what he wanted? And then you have Hannity and Limbaugh saying the sequester was nothing, and that the President was just scaring people. Now it's horrible, and all Obama's fault? I'm sorry, I got lost somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, I never said that Obama was gay- mistress, yes. Why else would he come to Vegas so many times and out West many more times when he doesn't have to.
    I think the sequester is good, if done properly, but Obama has decided to make the cuts hurt the most people possible and make cuts that are the most spectacular.
    As far as being gay, I would put my money on Michelle and one of the girls.

    ReplyDelete