Saturday, September 11, 2010

Titus Lies Again. And Again. And Again.

Dina Titus must have wood in her DNA, they way she lies like Pinocchio. Her nose must be the size of Jamie Far or Jimmy Durante by now.
In her latest commercial, She is called out by the uber liberal, Jon Ralston.

When you lose extremist liberal, Jon Ralston, and this is not the first time Ralston has called her out, you know you are having serious problems. Ralston would love to defend Titus but even Ralston has a conscious, I think.
Somehow Dina Titus was a professor in political science. Is this what she teaches in her classrooms, the art of lying in political advertisements? This woman, when she loses, should never be allowed in a classroom again.

6 comments:

  1. If you think Ralston is an uber-liberal, you've really got to read a book or two. How does your "conscious" let you write things like that?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you need to read a book or two as well. Not only is Ralston is an extreme liberal, he also is a racist.
    Look at all the crap he has pulled in the Reid-Angle race and the No Last Name and Sandoval race. Just pathetic. he's not even close to being obejective and I have documented it many times.
    Why Ralston is picking on Titus? Maybe she is the token liberal he has to cut down. That or she just a horrible candidate that even Ralston cannot stomach.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So, presented with information that contradicts your thesis, you conclude that ... your thesis is still correct, and the evidence you've observed with your own eyes is incorrect. I don't think you are being "obejective" either. The difference? Ralston is a commentator, and paid for his opinion. You are confined to spouting yours on a blog. When you are paid for your knowledge of politics by a real news organization, then we can talk.

    ReplyDelete
  4. First, I don't write a thesis, I write an opinion. Writing a thesis is for people like Dina Titus and other people who have no clue about the world. And being cute with your spelling corrections shows that you really don't have the facts to back up your argument.
    I have documented Ralston's behavior in the last year and it is well documented that he is an extremist liberal.
    I also do not need to be objective- I state at the top of the blog I am conservative. Ralston does not have the guts to say he is a liberal and extreme one at that. That is the difference.
    I really don't care "if we talk" even though we are writing. I don't need to be paid to write my opinion, but at least I don't hind behind the curtain like Ralston does. I admit to being a conservative, Ralston refuses to admit being a liberal. Why is he ashamed of being called a liberal? Maybe you can talk to him about that since he is being paid.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "...no clue about the world." That pretty much sums up this blog. If you're a conservative, consider this: The free market establishes value for various products and services, right? That's how we know how much to charge for them. Ralston is paid for his opinion, therefore the market says it has value. Your blog is totally free, therefore the market has established its value, too. Zero. Enough said.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Or, anon, I don't run advertisements because I don't want to. I have been asked many times by businesses to run advertisments on this blog, but I choose not to. I get an e-mail about once every two weeks from people who want to advertise here, so I guess that shoots down your thesis.

    ReplyDelete