From ESPN: Less than three weeks before the season kicks off, the NFL and the
NFL Referees Association are no closer to an agreement to end the
lockout of the officials.
As replacement officials work preseason
games -- and generally get criticized for their performances -- the
league and officials Thursday disputed such issues as full-time
employees and adding officiating crews.
On Sept. 5, the Cowboys
visit the Giants to open the season. Not since 2001 has the NFL played
games that count in the standings with replacement officials, and that
was for one week. This lockout began June 3.
The NFL is offering
to add three full officiating crews, increasing the total number of
officials to 140. League spokesman Greg Aiello said "this would reduce
stress on the officials by allowing each official to work fewer games,
would reduce travel, would allow us to do more intensive training,
integrate younger officials more effectively, increase diversity, and
improve quality of officiating."
"The union flatly opposes this proposal ..." Aiello added.
But the NFLRA insists the compensation being offered with such an increase would reduce their pay.
"The
increase in the number of officials was first proposed by the NFL to
the NFLRA by letter dated July 19, 2012 and had never been mentioned in
the preceding 10 months of negotiations," the NFLRA said in a statement.
"It is clear that this proposal is a negotiating tactic to attempt to
divert attention from the real issues."
Another key issue, one
Aiello noted will improve the quality of officiating long term, is
hiring full-time officials. The league is proposing having seven
officials -- one per position of referee, umpire, line judge, side
judge, back judge, field judge, head linesman -- who would train,
scout, handle communications, safety issues and rules interpretations
year-round. Now, all NFL game officials are part-time employees, with
outside jobs ranging from lawyer to teacher to business owner. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8275139/nfl-wants-reduce-referees-pay-add-three-full-time-crews
For the most part, I think the ref's and officials are in the right, except for the pay issue. The officials only work about 16-20 games a season and it would not be fair to pay them the same as a baseball umpire or basketball ref, even though the NFL ref's do a better job.
However, the NFL is wrong by demanding more referees that will dilute the ref pool and so, if they get paid per game, the ref's will lose money. And how much are we dealing, money wise? Probably less than $1 million which is tiny considering that football is a multi-billion dollar industry.
Further, making the jobs full time is not necessary nor is it fair to the ref's who have full time jobs now. You would think that they can work things out, unless the NFL is trying to break the ref union.
I honestly believe that the current ref's (not the replacements) do a great job for the most part and they are much better than their basketball, baseball and hockey counterparts. The do deserve a decent pay raise because of the safety issues and because football is swimming in money with the big TV contracts.
I don't agree much with unions very much, but in this case, I support the NFL ref's over the NFL owners.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I support the status of this blog. Writes very good status
ReplyDeleteIt is better not to leave the house because of the virus. Get ready to watch the game at home. Come here.NFLDTV .COM
ReplyDelete