On Thursday, Jon Ralston, on his blog, posted an extremely racist "column" by the news director of Univision. http://lasvegasbadger.blogspot.com/2010/07/now-jon-ralston-is-racist.html
Well, today, Ralston, in attempting to make a mountain out of ant hill, says this about the racist article: "But the reporter who did the interview and several other staffers told the news director about the conversation shortly afterward, which explains how it appeared in her column for El Tiempo. It is that column where the remark first appeared – and its vitriolic (and inappropriate for a news executive) attack on Sandoval surely has caused fits for the Univision higher-ups. Indeed, the staffers and the reporter/anchor have been asked by higher-ups and all told the same or similar stories as to what Sandoval said."
Ok, if this column was inappropriate for a news executive and vitriolic, why did Ralston print the entire article? Why hasn't Ralston condemned the article as racist?
Well, probably because Ralston doesn't think the article was racist, which just shows his blatant racism.
Ralston is so desperate to help Rory No Last Name and Harry Reid that he will stop at nothing to slander Sharron Angle and Brian Sandoval and that includes lying, manufacturing scandals and blatant racism. Journalistic ethics mean nothing to Ralston. I have read many journalists in my time and the duo of Ralston and Brian Greenspun, editor of the Las Vegas Sun are the two worst and most ethically challenged journalists I have ever seen or read.
With the exception of the liberal Kool Aide drinkers, I think most people see through these to clowns, or at least I hope so.